Navigating Conflict in Classroom Dialogue

Conflict in the classroom poses a dilemma for teachers

When students learn to communicate constructively across differences as youth, they are much more likely to be constructive communicators as adults.

But when teachers invite students to speak their minds, they worry that doing so may put vulnerable students and ourselves at risk.

As a result, many students report that whenever a conversation comes close to controversy, teachers shut it down, especially minority viewpoints that they fear may offend.

However, routinely avoiding conflict has negative consequences: 

  • Missed teachable moments
  • Students are left to their own devices – fight, flight, or freak out – often online 
  • Students are left with the disquieting impression that the world is so dangerous that their trusted adults refuse to talk about it
  • Students with minority views that they don’t feel they can express at school may seek confirmation from untrustworthy sources and people online
  • Avoiding difficult conversations does not protect students; it leaves them without the skills or relationships they need to navigate them

But not all classroom dialogue topics are controversial

The dialogue muscle is built in various contexts in school:

  • Advisors leading connecting and empathy building activities
  • Art teachers asking whether beauty is universal or color is real
  • Humanities teachers asking students to analyze text
  • Math and science teachers asking students to solve problems collaboratively 
  • Coaches and directors asking students to analyze the latest game or performance
  • School leaders crowd sourcing for solutions to schoolwide issues
  • Student leaders seeking input on ways to promote school spirit
  • Anyone posing questions that have multiple right answers or no answers at all

And not all conflict is unproductive

Good conflict is “friction that leads somewhere useful and does not collapse into dehumanization” (Amanda Ripley)

Good conflict fuels learning

Good conflict is more likely when:

  • Norms and expectations for a dialogue are clearly set before it begins
  • Classrooms and schools intentionally nurture constructive dialogue as a keystone habit of mind and practice
  • Students get comfortable being uncomfortable
  • Some students are equipped and empowered to lead

When potentially unproductive conflict arises 

Many excellent resources exist that detail tools to use in the moment that conflict begins to be unproductive. See descriptions below.

Teachers can develop confidence through practice using the tools with colleagues employing scenarios that worry them

If teachers feel a classroom dialogue is becoming harmful, they always have the option to shut shut it down 

When that happens, the teacher should seek counsel and loop back to the conversation as soon as possible

Tools for navigating conflict in classroom dialogue

Navigating High Conflict

(Apapted from book by Amanda Ripley)

High Conflict: A conflict that becomes self-perpetuating and all-consuming, in which almost everyone ends up worse off. Typically an us-versus-them conflict.

Good Conflict: Friction that can be serious and intense but leads somewhere useful. Does not collapse into dehumanization. Also known as healthy conflict.

How to Prevent High Conflict

  • Recognize high conflict in the world and in yourself
  • Investigate the understory: understand what is really driving the conflict
  • Reduce the binary: identify overlap between parties in conflict
  • Marginalize the fire starters: create distance from those who are primarily motivated by being in conflict
  • Buy time and make space: pause and even step away when conflict is becoming unproductive
  • Complicate the narrative: in difficult conflict, simplicity can be blinding. Get curious, investigate contractions, ask questions.

When someone crosses a boundary in conversation 

(Adapted from Resetting the Table)

  1. Ask questions to check your assumptions. Make sure this person is truly expressing unacceptable views before shutting down the conversation. “The term you used can be very harmful to a lot of groups. Can you explain where you’re coming from with that term?”
  2. Ask about values without legitimizing the belief – That might sound like, “I hear you talking about safety, but the way I’ve heard you talk about it means people like me, or people I care about, will be harmed. That’s really hard for me to hear. Even though it’s difficult for me to ask you, I’m interested to know how you think about that. Would you share more?”
  3. Shift gears to a writing/thinking moment in the dialogue and try to speak to the “boundary crosser” privately so as not to embarrass put them on the spot.. 
  4. Close the conversation – This is last for a reason – make sure you’ve exhausted your options, checked in with your own boundaries, considered the impact on group members, and decided this conversation cannot stay constructive based on what’s been said. You might close by saying “I am concerned that this conversation has crossed over into a place of harm. As the facilitator, it is my job to ensure a conversation stays constructive, and this one is no longer constructive. I think one-on-one conversations might be a better fit at this time, so let’s close for now.”

“Dignity” Phrases – Diffuse contempt when the conversation gets hot 

(from the Dignity Index)

“Can you tell me more about that?”

“Wow. I think just the opposite. Can you tell me how you came to that view?”

“Let’s figure out what we disagree on; it can’t be everything.”

“I want to hear what you think.”

“Can you tell me what I’m not getting?”

“Can you explain that to me?”

“How do you think we fix it?”

“That’s fascinating; I need to think about that.”

“Thanks for talking with me; a lot of folks won’t talk to people they disagree with.”

“If we talk long enough, we’re going to find out we share some values.” 

Conflict Navigation Tools 

(from the Constructive Dialogue Institute)

  1. Ask Questions

Questions Like:

“What makes you say that?”

“Why is that important to you?”

“How do you know?”

“Can you say more about what you mean when you say ________?”

“Why do you think that is?”

“Have you always felt that way?”

“Say more about that.”

  1. Name Values and Feelings

Name Values

What it is: Connecting participant beliefs to Moral Foundations Theory values.

What it sounds like: “It’s clear to me that many of you are concerned about freedom and liberty being upheld on this campus.”

Name Feelings

What it is: Stating what people might be feeling based on your observations.

What it sounds like: “I am hearing that many of you are feeling frustrated. Am I getting that right?”

  1. Shift Gears

Pause

What it’s good for: Slowing down the conversation so people can think and speak with intention.

What it sounds like: “Since things are getting going pretty fast, I think this is a good time to pause to take a breath.”

Pair and Small Group Work

What it’s good for: Breaking up full group dynamic, inviting new voices, inviting people to speak who are less likely to talk in full group settings.

What it sounds like: “Things are moving pretty fast. Let’s break into pairs and talk about how we’re feeling about this conversation right now.”

Think Then Speak

What it’s good for: Allowing participants with different sharing styles the chance to process what they want to share and prepare to speak.

What it sounds like: “Let’s all pause, think for 1 minute about [prompt]. [after 1 min] I want to invite anyone to share their ideas.”

Go-Round

What it’s good for: Promoting fairness by inviting all voices to speak.

What it sounds like: “This conversation is important and I’d like to invite other voices to weigh in on it. Let’s do a go-round where everyone shares 1 sentence about [prompt].”

Journal Write

What it’s good for: Creating a longer pause; giving each participant a chance to process their thoughts and feeling

What it sounds like: Let’s take a break from all of the talking. I am sure we all have a lot running through our minds: Please take 5 minutes to write about what’s top of mind for you right now in this dialogue.” 

  1. Confront the Conflict

Behaviors/Impact/Needs (BIN) Framework

What it is: A way to address a word or phrase that triggered misunderstanding or offense, and redirect to a more constructive conversation.

  • Behavior: What happened/what was said
  • Impact: The impact it had on the speaker
  • Needs: What might work better going forward

What it sounds like: “When I heard you say (exact word/phrase), it [had this effect on me]. In the future, I’d prefer if you [say this instead].”

Mention the Intention (Norm)

What it is: Without blame or shame, address the item from the group intentions (norms) list that isn’t being upheld and offer another approach that might work better.

To address the full group: “I am noticing some interrupting, which was something we wanted to avoid in our group intentions. This can be difficult when so many of you have things you’d like to share. As much as possible, I’d like to invite you to keep to the intention we set, which was to ‘speak one at a time’ so that all voices are heard.”

To address an individual: “I’m hearing you say ‘we as women,’ instead of speaking for yourself, which is one of our group intentions. Can you rephrase using an ‘I statement’?”

Student Dialogue Facilitation 101

What is the role of a facilitator in a dialogue? 

The facilitator is responsible for keeping the dialogue on track and in adherence to dialogue guidelines. They also often take the lead in managing time and ensuring each person’s voice is heard. The facilitator does all they can to promote the 3C’s during the dialogue: curiosity, care and courage.    

What is Facilitation?

To facilitate is “to make easier” or “help bring about.” (Merriam Webster).  The facilitator guides the dialogue and attempts to maximize participant’s time and energy by keeping the discussions on track – in terms of time and topic.  Facilitation generally encourages all members to participate in some way, shape or form.  By recognizing and utilizing the unique and valuable contributions of each member, an effective facilitator increases the collective value of the entire community.  The facilitator plays an active and critical role in ensuring that a community taps deeply into its own knowledge and practices curiosity, care and courage with one another. 

What Makes a Good Facilitator?

Competent facilitators have both traits and acquired skills that make them good at what they do.  Many good facilitators make a difficult process seem very natural and intuitive, even when lots of planning and training goes into the craft.  Chances are, if you’ve volunteered to take on this role, you have these traits or you have an inclination toward them.  

  • Good facilitators value people and their ideas
  • Good facilitators think quickly and logically
  • Good facilitators are excellent communicators
  • Good facilitators are both product and process oriented

What are the Facilitator’s Basic Responsibilities?

  • Prepare in Advance. 

Good facilitators prepare in advance to be effective.  They take into consideration the “who, what, why, and where” of your dialogue to help you figure out the “how.”

  • Plan and Share the Agenda or Dialogue Protocol/Process.
  • Name the Learning Targets and/or Dialogue Purposes at the Outset of the Dialogue.   
  • Establish or Review Community Expectations/Guidelines or Norms for the Dialogue.
  • Guide the Group in Presenting and Sharing Information. 

This will likely be detailed in the  plan for the dialogue. 

  • Provide closure. Offer Thanks and state any Action Items or Next Steps.  

Some Trouble-Shooting Tips

  1. Staying on-task and on-time.  

You may have a lot you hope to discuss in a short amount of time.  With passionate and knowledgeable peers, it is easy to veer off onto other topics or get side-tracked by minute details of a dialogue topic. In order to help the group stay focused, you may want to:

  • Remind the group of the learning targets or overarching questions.
  • Re-focus the group on a new question that connects back to your learning target or purpose.
  • Close the discussion tangent or set it aside in a “parking lot” for consideration later. 
  • Let the group decide if they want to continue with the current discussion direction or return to the stated targets or questions. 
  1. Dealing with unproductive behavior.  

Difficult behavior is often unintentional or occurs as the result of an emotionally charged situation.  You might also be dealing with inattentive peers who are engaging in side conversations, or other off-task behavior.  You might also be dealing with behavior that is disrespectful to the group, the content or particular dialogue members. Here are some strategies you can try:    

  • Take a pause. Ask participants to reflect quietly or write down what they’re thinking /feeling before resuming the discussion.  
  • Restate the ground rules/guidelines that the group or individual participants may have strayed from. .
  • Respectfully seek clarification from a participant who may be off-task.
  • Address the issue with the participant during a break or time when participants are working individually.
  • A gross violation of group ground rules should be addressed more promptly or else it might be perceived as acceptable, inviting further potential harm. For instance if a participant engages in an “ad hominem” attack (attacking a participant for their beliefs, rather than disagreeing with their ideas) or if a participant otherwise demeans participants (or folks not in the room), it might be advisable to have the group “take a pause” as noted above, refer back to the ground rules and then speak privately with the offending student.
  • If the unproductive behavior persists, seek help from a teacher in the room.
  1. When a Dialogue Lags…  

While your peers will often have a lot to say during a dialogue, it is not uncommon for a dialogue to experience a  lull or even prolonged silences.  In fact, you can let peers know at the outset that silences will happen and are OK. Here are some techniques to keep the conversation going:  

  • Use questions like these that work in most any dialogue. 
  • Consider offering a question that allows peers to draw from their experiences.
  • Ask any peers who have not yet contributed if they would like to speak up.
  • Offer a new, substantive question and then give peers an opportunity to write for a few minutes before resuming the discussion. 

Workshop Facilitation Checklist

Things to think about while planning your workshop:

  • How will you organize the workshop?
    • Is this a “stand and deliver” experience where you stand at the front of the room and do a presentation? 
    • Is this a “circle experience” where participants will sit in a circle for dialogue/discussion?
    • Will there be individual creative work?
    • Will there be a group activity or project?
    • Will you have a panel?
    • Will it be a combination of some of the above?
  • What are your strategies for generating discussion and energy in the room?
    • Think about your opening: How will you help folks feel welcome and comfortable in the space? Will you do introductions? Will you have an icebreaker? Will you ask them what kind of energy they are bringing with them? How will you create a space for connection and sharing?
    • Will you create time for movement/everyone getting out of their seats?
    • Are there moments when you can ask participants to “turn and talk” to a neighbor?”
    • Can you build in a combination of individual, partner, small group, and whole group activities?
    • Think about your closing, even if it is going around the room and sharing just one word or idea.
  • How can your workshop connect to this year’s theme, __________? Are there shared takeaways or goals or hopes that participants might walk away with?

A few more things to remember:

  • Do you need technology? If so, you’ll need to bring a MacBook with your presentation on it. What happens if you plan for tech and it falls through? Be sure to have a backup plan if this happens.
  • Will you need “materials” for participants? If so, plan for 2-5 more than expected if creating handouts or other takeaway material
  • Be sure to check out your workshop space ahead of time.
  • What if just a few voices are dominating the discussion? “We’d love to hear from some who haven’t had a chance to speak… Is there anyone we haven’t heard from today who’d like to share…?”
  • Have a plan to fill the time if you finish early

When creating your working agenda, consider these parts:

  •  Objectives (what the facilitator  hopes to accomplish)
  •  Learning Outcomes (what the facilitator hopes the participants will take away)
  •  Materials (what materials/supplies are needed for the workshop)
  •  Time (how much time is allotted for the workshop and for each part)
  •  Agenda (the plan for how to use the time)

Items to share with participants at the start:

  • The Objectives (what’s the basic plan for the workshop)
  • The Learning Outcomes (what you hope participants will learn or take away)
  • The general plan for the workshop

Possible Questions for any Constructive Dialogue

  • What do you believe about this issue? 
  • What experiences or sources (people, texts) led you to have this belief? 
  • What is over-simplified about this issue? 
  • What do you want to understand about the other side? 
  • What do you want the other side to understand about you? 
  • What would it feel like/look like if you woke up and this problem was solved? 
  • What’s the question nobody’s asking? 
  • What do you want to know about this issue that you don’t already know?. 
  • Where do you feel torn? 
  • Can you tell me more?

Synthesis Questions: Based on this dialogue…. 

  • What have you learned about others’ perspectives or your own? 
  • What has shifted in your perspective? 
  • What are some areas of common ground? 
  • Why do we engage with people with whom we disagree? 
  • What’s lost – personally and societally — if we remain in our ideological bubbles?
  • What are your take-aways and/or next steps?